Employers told to look at single-sex space policies

Employers told to look at single-sex space policies


The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) issued the warning after the ruling, published on Friday, said sharing single-sex changing rooms with a trans colleague had created β€œa hostile, intimidating, humiliating and degrading environment” for nurses in Darlington.

Eight members of the Day Surgery Unit at Darlington Memorial Hospital brought a claim against County Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust after Rose Henderson, who was born male but identifies as a woman, was allowed to use the women’s changing facilities.

Rose Henderson (Image: NORTH NEWS)

An EHRC spokesperson said the equality regulator would consider the tribunal decision.

The spokesperson said: β€œEmployers – especially those that offer changing facilities for their staff – should also be considering the issues raised in this ruling for their own policies and practices.

β€œThis would include being aware of the kind of actions found to constitute indirect discrimination and harassment of staff in this particular case.”

The EHRC has shared an updated services code of practice with the minister for women and equalities Bridget Phillipson for approval, although it said the issues raised by the tribunal were more closely related to the existing employment code of practice which it is planning to update.

β€œWe hope that the updated code can be laid in Parliament without delay, so that statutory guidance is made available to those that need it as soon as it can be,” the spokesperson said.

Ms Phillipson recently acknowledged people want β€œclarity” on the subject but said there is a balance to be sought between ensuring safe spaces for women and trans people’s access to the services they need.

The NHS in England acknowledged the need to revise its policy on single-sex spaces, but said it is waiting for the EHRC guidance before it can take action.

An NHS spokesman said: β€œWe are working through the implications of the Supreme Court ruling, and we absolutely recognise the need for revised guidance on same-sex accommodation as soon as possible.

β€œIt’s important that we wait for the Equality and Human Rights Commission to publish its statutory guidance following the Supreme Court’s judgment before final decisions about future policy are taken – but we are working closely with Government to ensure we can provide updated guidance for the health service as soon as possible.”

Lisa Lockey and Bethany Hutchison speaking at the press conference in Newcastle (Image: PA/Owen Humpreys)

While the tribunal ruling is not binding on other trusts, it is expected to ramp up the pressure on both the NHS to have a clear and consistent policy and on the Government to implement Britain-wide employer guidance which they have been considering since September.

Nurse Bethany Hutchison, who led the claim, said the NHS β€œcannot ignore this (issue) any longer”, adding: β€œAllowing men to access female-only spaces simply because they claim to be women undermines truth and erodes common sense.”

She described the wait for the Government to publish and implement the updated code of practice, handed to ministers more than four months ago by regulator the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC), as β€œquite frustrating”.

She told reporters the Government was β€œclearly dragging their feet and they need to pick up the pace”.

Ms Hutchison added: β€œThis is not a difficult thing to work out. It’s pretty simple, and I think this ruling has shown that.”

The code, which will be used by businesses and other organisations to inform their provision of single and separate-sex services such as toilets and changing rooms, has been updated by the regulator in the wake of the Supreme Court ruling in April that the terms β€œwoman” and β€œsex” in the 2010 Equality Act β€œrefer to a biological woman and biological sex”.

But the draft code – described by the EHRC spokesperson as β€œboth legally accurate and as clear as it is possible to be” – requires ministerial approval and would only come into force 40 days after the Government had laid it in Parliament.



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *